マルコフ性のためのおべんきょう
In what follows, represents a probability space and the expectation under is denoted by .
Proposition. Let and be measurable spaces, be a bounded measurable function, and be a sub -field of . If an -valued r.v. is -measurable and an -valued r.v. is independent of , we have the following:
(1) , a.s.
(2) , -a.s.
Proof. Recalling the construction of integration in the general measure theory, we may assume that is the form for . Furthermore, the Dynkin's theorem allows to be the form for , .
(1) Since is -measurable and is independent of , we see
\begin{align*}
E[\boldsymbol{1}_A(X)\boldsymbol{1}_B(Y)|\mathcal{G}]
&= \boldsymbol{1}_A(X)E[\boldsymbol{1}_B(Y)] \\
&= E[\boldsymbol{1}_A(x)\boldsymbol{1}_B(Y)]\big|_{x=X}, \quad \text{a.s.}
\end{align*}
As for , it is followed by the same argument since is -measurable and is independent of .
(2) Suppose . Then, by the independence between and , we see that
\begin{align*}
E[\boldsymbol{1}_A(X)\boldsymbol{1}_B(Y);X\in C]
&= E[\boldsymbol{1}_B(Y)]E[\boldsymbol{1}_A(X);X\in C] \\
&= \int_{C}P_X(dx) \boldsymbol{1}_A(x) E[\boldsymbol{1}_B(Y)].
\end{align*}
Thus, we obtain
\begin{align*}
E[\boldsymbol{1}_A(X)\boldsymbol{1}_B(Y)|X=x]
&= E[\boldsymbol{1}_A(x)\boldsymbol{1}_B(Y)], \quad \text{$P_X$-a.s.}
\end{align*}
We now complete the proof. □
Remark 1. We note that how to apply the Dynkin's theorem in the proposition.
It is easy to see that
\begin{align*}
\mathcal{P} := \{A\times B~;~ A\in\mathcal{B}_1, B\in\mathcal{B}_2\}
\end{align*}
is a -system in ; that is, and it holds for any .
Denote by the collection of satisfying
\begin{align*}
E[\boldsymbol{1}_A(X,Y)|\mathcal{G}]
&= E[\boldsymbol{1}_A(x,Y)]\big|_{x=X}.
\end{align*}
Then, is a -system; that is, all of the followings are fulfilled:
- .
- for any , .
- for any , .
Then one can apply the Dynkin's theorem and get . The remainings are also shown in the same way as above.
Remark 2. The proposition above holds even if the assumption of is relaxed to that is integrable.
Remark 3. It can be seen directly that is a -field.
We now show the Markov property of a geometric Browinan motion.
Example. Let , where is a Brownian motion starting at the origin, and let be a bounded function. And denotes the Brownian filtration. By (1) of the proposition above, we get, for ,
\begin{align*}
E[f(X^x_t)|\mathcal{F}_s]
&= E[f(xe^{\alpha s + \beta B_s}e^{\alpha (t-s) + \beta (B_t-B_s)})|\mathcal{F}_s] \\
&= E[f(ye^{\alpha (t-s) + \beta B_{t-s}})]\big|_{y=X^x_s} \\
&= E[f(X^y_{t-s})]\big|_{y=X^x_s},
\end{align*}
where, in the second equality, we use the fact that holds in distribution.